Re-Open protestors carried guns and threatened violence. Why did no one tear gas them?

Photo by Joshua A Bickel via AP
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Since Tuesday, the wrongful murder of George Floyd, who was pinned down and suffocated by a cop, has generated outrage throughout the country. But nowhere have protests been more violent or intense than in Minneapolis, the city where the murder occurred.

By Thursday, peaceful protests there descended into looting and burning, partially in response to police tear gassing and firing rubber bullets at protestors. Several videos went viral that showed a Target that had been completely ravaged.

The police officers involved in the murder were fired but they have yet to face any charges.

Images of the Minneapolis protests have been starkly juxtaposed with “Re-Open” protests that occurred at the height of the pandemic throughout the country. Many of those protestors carried guns, threatened to turn violent and endangered public health by gathering in large groups and not wearing masks. Although some of those protestors also carried hate symbols, they were largely left alone.

The police response to the two protests exposed a double-standard in who is allowed to express outrage and who is not. Although the burning and looting in Minneapolis by protestors feels extreme, it is also important to reflect how differently the two groups were treated from the start. How would “re-open” protestors have reacted if police had fired rubber bullets and tear gas at them?

Stay Connected To The Culture

Our Most Important Stories Of The Week